Has Logical Thinking Been Lost in the Medical Industry?
A Critical Look at "Safe and Effective"
In an age of information overload, it's increasingly easy to outsource our critical thinking to authorities and prevailing narratives. Nowhere is this more apparent, for many, than in the medical industry, especially when it comes to vaccines. The refrain "safe and effective" has become a mantra, often accepted without deeper scrutiny, despite readily available information that might prompt a more logical, questioning approach.
Let's unpack this with some simple, logical observations.
The "Unavoidably Unsafe" Reality:
Many people are unaware that the U.S. Supreme Court, in Bruesewitz v. Wyeth (2011), effectively deemed vaccines "unavoidably unsafe." If a product is genuinely "safe," why would it require legal protection from liability due to unavoidable risks? This single point should, logically, trigger a pause and a question mark. It suggests that while beneficial, vaccines are not without inherent risks, a reality often overshadowed by the "safe and effective" messaging.
Blind Acceptance vs. Critical Inquiry:
How many people, when presented with a vaccine, truly question its contents, its precise mechanism of action within the body, or the full spectrum of potential side effects, both immediate and long-term? For many, the answer is very few. The prevailing sentiment is often one of blind trust, driven by what can feel like fear-based messaging disguised as a pursuit of "safety."
A Generational Health Crisis: What's Changed?
Step back and look at the health of the current generation of children. We are witnessing an unprecedented rise in conditions like ADHD, allergies, autoimmune disorders, and chronic illnesses, reflected in the soaring numbers of 504 plans and IEPs in schools. This wasn't the norm for previous generations.
When we observe such a drastic shift in population health, logical thinking demands we ask: "What has fundamentally changed?"
Certainly, factors like nutrition and exposure to toxic chemicals play a role, but these variables often have significant individual variance. Not everyone eats the same diet or uses the same products. However, one intervention has become nearly universal for the majority of children: vaccination.
The 1986 Turning Point and the Expanding Schedule:
This brings us to a crucial logical observation: the dramatic expansion of the childhood vaccine schedule post-1986. This year is significant because it's when the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA) was passed, effectively shielding vaccine manufacturers from liability. If a product is so unequivocally safe, why was such a liability shield deemed necessary?
Now, consider the coinciding timelines: the steep increase in the vaccine schedule post-1986 aligns disturbingly with the escalating rates of diagnoses like autism and a host of chronic illnesses. While correlation does not equal causation, a logical mind would at least consider this temporal relationship as a strong signal for further investigation, rather than dismissing it outright.
Demystifying the Ingredients:
The next logical step in this critical inquiry is to examine the ingredients in vaccines. A simple search reveals a cocktail of substances: aluminum adjuvants, mercury (in some forms, though largely removed from many childhood vaccines, still present in some flu shots), formaldehyde, polysorbate 80, and various biological components. A basic understanding of toxicology would lead one to question the cumulative impact of these substances, especially when injected into developing systems. Are these substances truly benign in the doses and combinations administered over a child's early life?
The Uncomfortable Conclusion:
For a mind engaged in simple, logical deduction, these points coalesce into a challenging conclusion: that the narrative of "safe and effective" might be incomplete, and that a deeper, more critical examination of vaccine policy and its potential health ramifications is not only warranted but essential.
It's understandable to feel frustration and even sarcasm when faced with what appears to be a widespread reluctance to engage in such basic logical thinking. However, the path forward lies in continuing to share information, ask uncomfortable questions, and encourage others to think critically and logically. Only by fostering a culture of informed inquiry can we hope to see a shift towards a more transparent and truly health-centric approach to medicine.
To learn more about vaccines please visit the Vaccine Information of my Substack for free information as well as a link to my book “What’s Missing?: What They Don’t Tell You About Vaccines”
Thank you for reading GreaterGood Health and Healing! As always, my content is free to read and subscribe to. If you’d like to support my work, any amount is genuinely appreciated—you can do so via PayPal or Venmo. Your encouragement and support mean a great deal.
